Types of Naval Officers - Drawn from the History of the British Navy by A. T. (Alfred Thayer) Mahan
page 37 of 431 (08%)
page 37 of 431 (08%)
|
either by signal or otherwise." Technically, the effect of this finding
was to shift an obvious and gross blunder from the captain to some one else; but it is evident that if the _Dorsetshire_ had occupied her station astern of the _Marlborough_, the fire-ship's attempt would have been much facilitated. The Court decided unanimously that Burrish "ought to have borne down as far to leeward as where the admiral first began to engage, notwithstanding that the admiral might be hauled off before the _Dorsetshire_ got so far to leeward." The point upon which the line should have been formed was thus established by the Court's finding. The subsequent proceedings of this ship need not be related. She now came slowly into close action, but that part of the enemy's order was already broken, and their rear vessels, the fear of which had controlled her captain, passed by as they came up without serious action. How far Burrish's example influenced the captains immediately behind him cannot certainly be affirmed. Such shyness as he displayed is not only infectious, but saps that indispensable basis upon which military effectiveness reposes, namely, the certainty of co-operation and support, derived from mutual confidence, inspired by military discipline, obedience, and honor. It is well to note here that the remoteness of Lestock's division thus affected Burrish, who evidently could not understand either its distance or its failure to approach, and who, being what he was, saw himself threatened with want of that backing which he himself was refusing to the _Marlborough_. While he was blaming Lestock, hard things were being said about him in Lestock's division; but the lesson of Lestock's influence upon Burrish is not less noteworthy because the latter forfeited both duty and honor by his hesitation. It is to be feared that the captain of the _Essex_, |
|