Scientific American Supplement, No. 315, January 14, 1882 by Various
page 36 of 143 (25%)
page 36 of 143 (25%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
have been able in most cases either to meet the difficulty or prove it
groundless. In this connection I am led to speak of the common idea that electric light is injurious to the eyes, first, because of its unsteady character, and secondly, by reason of the great excess of the more refrangible rays. Both objections undoubtedly hold good where the alleged causes exist; but we can now show you a light which is certainly as steady as the ordinary gaslight--indeed more steady in an apartment where even feeble currents of air circulate; and I am sure you will readily acknowledge that the latter objection is disposed of when I assure you that our light presents the only example with which I am acquainted of an exact artificial reproduction of the solar light, as shown by decomposition. The two spectra, placed side by side, show in the most conclusive manner the identity in composition of our light with that of the sun. The remarkable coolness of the electric light, as compared with its volume by gas, is also due in a great measure to the conspicuous absence of that large excess of less refrangible, or heat-radiating principle, which distinguishes almost equally all other modes of artificial illumination. After the foregoing statement it may seem a paradox to claim that the electric arc develops the greatest heat with which we have yet had to deal, but this is so; and the heat has an intensity quite beyond the reach of accurate measurement by any instrument now known--it has been variously estimated anywhere between 5,000° and 50,000° F. It is sufficient for our present purpose to know that the most refractory substances quickly disappear when brought under its influence--even the imperial diamond must succumb in a short time. In order to reconcile this fact with its coolness as an |
|