The War After the War by Isaac Frederick Marcosson
page 37 of 174 (21%)
page 37 of 174 (21%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Protection in England, hitched to a world-wide freeze-out business
campaign against Germany, would doubtless divert a whole new international discount business to New York. German exporters under these circumstances might refuse payments from their other customers on London, demanding bills on New York instead. To hold this business, however, we should need direct banking and cable connections with all the grand divisions of trade, adequate sea-carrying power, dollar credits, and a government friendly to business. Then, there is the middle English ground which demands a "tariff for revenue only," and subsidy--not protection--for the new industries. Combating all this is the dyed-in-the-bone free trader, who points to the fact that free trade made England the richest of the Allies and gave her control of the sea. "How can a nation that is one huge seaport, and which lives by foreign trade, ever be a protectionist?" he asks. If he has his way we shall have to struggle harder for our share of universal business. More than this, it will block what is likely to be one of Germany's schemes for rehabilitation. Here is the possible procedure: Germany's financial position after the war will be badly strained. She can be saved only by an effective export policy. To do this she must seek all possible neutral markets; and to get them quickly she will offer broad--even extravagant--reciprocity programmes. They may conflict with the proposed Franco-British programmes of protection and embargo against neutral trade interests. But if the Franco-British programme leaves the allied markets for goods |
|