Logic - Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read
page 35 of 478 (07%)
page 35 of 478 (07%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
denied; (2) a Predicate (as _soluble in water_) which is asserted or
denied of the Subject, and (3) the Copula (_is_ or _are_, or _is not_ or _are not_), the sign of relation between the Subject and Predicate. The Subject and Predicate are called the Terms of the proposition: and the Copula may be called the sign of predication, using the verb 'to predicate' indefinitely for either 'to affirm' or 'to deny.' Thus _S is P_ means that the term _P_ is given as related in some way to the term _S_. We may, therefore, further define a Proposition as 'a sentence in which one term is predicated of another.' In such a proposition as _Salt dissolves_, the copula (_is_) is contained in the predicate, and, besides the subject, only one element is exhibited: it is therefore said to be _secundi adjacentis_. When all three parts are exhibited, as in _Salt is soluble_, the proposition is said to be _tertii adjacentis_. For the ordinary purposes of Logic, in predicating attributes of a thing or class of things, the copula _is_, or _is not_, sufficiently represents the relation of subject and predicate; but when it is desirable to realise fully the nature of the relation involved, it may be better to use a more explicit form. Instead of saying _Salt--is--soluble_, we may say _Solubility--coinheres with--the nature of salt_, or _The putting of salt in water--is a cause of--its dissolving_: thus expanding the copula into a full expression of the relation we have in view, whether coinherence or causation. § 3. The sentences of ordinary discourse are, indeed, for the most part, longer and more complicated than the logical form of propositions; it is in order to prove them, or to use them in the proof of other propositions, that they are in Logic reduced as nearly as possible to |
|