Logic - Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read
page 64 of 478 (13%)
page 64 of 478 (13%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
related; for their very difference helps to make both notions distinct;
and their intimate connection is shown in this, that five yards are traversed in a certain time, and that five minutes are measured by the motion of an index over some fraction of a yard upon the dial. The distinction, then, between relative and non-relative terms must rest, not upon a fundamental difference between them (since, in fact, all words are relative), but upon the way in which words are used. We have seen that some words, such as 'up-down,' 'cause-effect,' can only be used relatively; and these may, for distinction, be called Correlatives. But other words, whose meanings are only partially interdependent, may often be used without attending to their relativity, and may then be considered as Absolute. We cannot say 'the hunter returned empty handed,' without implying that 'the prey escaped'; but we may say 'the man went supperless to bed,' without implying that 'the chamois rejoiced upon the mountain.' Such words as 'man' and 'chamois' may, then, in their use, be, as to one another, non-relative. To illustrate further the relativity of terms, we may mention some of the chief classes of them. Numerical order: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.; 1st implies 2nd, and 2nd 1st; and 3rd implies 1st and 2nd, but these do not imply 3rd; and so on. Order in Time or Place: before-after; early-punctual-late; right-middle-left; North-South, etc. As to Extent, Volume, and Degree: greater-equal-less; large-medium-small; whole and part. |
|