Introduction to Non-Violence by Theodore Paullin
page 77 of 109 (70%)
page 77 of 109 (70%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
government. If he so much as voted for its officials, he had to share
the moral responsibility for the wars, capital punishment, and other personal injuries which were carried out in its name. He insisted: "There is no escape from this terrible moral responsibility but by a conscientious withdrawal from such government, and an uncompromising protest against so much of its fundamental creed and constitutional law, as is decidedly anti-Christian. He must cease to be its pledged supporter, and approving dependent."[105] Like the Mennonites, he saw that the reason that governments were unchristian was that the people themselves were not Christian; but unlike the Mennonites he maintained that they might eventually become so, and that it was the duty of the Christian to hasten the day of their complete conversion. "This," he said, "is not to be done by voting at the polls, by seeking influential offices in the government and binding ourselves to anti-Christian political compacts. It is to be done by pure Christian precepts faithfully inculcated, and pure Christian examples on the part of those who have been favored to receive and embrace the highest truths."[106] The Mennonites believed that man was essentially depraved; Ballou believed that he was perfectible.[107] |
|