An Expository Outline of the "Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation" - With a Notice of the Author's "Explanations:" A Sequel to the Vestiges by Anonymous
page 65 of 84 (77%)
page 65 of 84 (77%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
legislator.
The work, however, will live, and deserves to live. The temple of nature has been looked into, not profoundly, perhaps, nor always successfully; but in a fearless spirit, and with a highly-accomplished mind. Had the divine COSMOS been more fully dwelt upon and depicted--had the harmony, beauty, and beneficence of creation been more fully and exclusively displayed--we should have been more gratified; but we are thankful, in the main, for what we have received. An impulse has been given to popular inquiry, and a vast field for discussion opened, from which we can prospectively discern neither less love for man, nor reverence for God. Who the author is we have no certain knowledge. It is not, we suspect, Lord KING, nor Lord THURLOW, nor Lady BYRON; but it may be the author of the _Essay on the Formation of Opinions_, and of the _Principle of Representation_. Mr. BAILEY, of Sheffield, though little known, possesses the fine reasoning powers, intellectual grasp, independence of research, abstract analysis, and attic style, that would qualify him to produce the _Vestiges of Creation_, though we never heard that he is a great natural philosopher. But, as just hinted, deep science is not evinced by the _Vestiges_, only an able, systematic, and tasteful arrangement of its distant and recent advances. "EXPLANATIONS:" A SEQUEL TO THE |
|