Moral Principles and Medical Practice - The Basis of Medical Jurisprudence by Charles Coppens
page 50 of 155 (32%)
page 50 of 155 (32%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
their reputation by this unnatural and guilty sacrifice.
"Married women, also, from the fear of labor, from indisposition to have the care, the expense, or the trouble of children, or some other motive equally trifling and degrading, have solicited that the embryo should be destroyed by their medical attendant. And when such individuals are informed of the nature of the transaction, there is an expression of real or pretended surprise that any one should deem that act improper, much more guilty; nay, in spite even of the solemn warnings of the physician, they will resort to the debased and murderous charlatan, who, for a piece of silver, will annihilate the life of the fÅtus, and endanger even that of its ignorant or guilty mother. "This low estimate of the importance of fÅtal life is by no means restricted to the ignorant or to the lower classes of society. Educated, refined, and fashionable women, yea, in many instances, women whose lives are in other respects without reproach--mothers who are devoted with an ardent and self-denying affection to the children who already constitute the family--are perfectly indifferent concerning the fÅtus _in utero_. They seem not to realize that the being within them is indeed _animate_, that it is in verity a _human_ being, body and spirit; that it is of importance; that its value is inestimable, having reference to this world and the next. Hence they in every way neglect its interests. They eat and drink, they walk and ride; they will practise no self-restraint, but will indulge every caprice, every passion, utterly regardless of the unseen, unloved embryo.... "These facts are horrible, but they are too frequent and too true; often, very often, must all the eloquence and all the authority of the practitioner be employed; often he must as it were grasp the conscience |
|