Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910 - The New York Tunnel Extension of the Pennsylvania Railroad. - The East River Tunnels. Paper No. 1159 by S. H. Woodard;Francis Mason;James H. Brace
page 37 of 93 (39%)
page 37 of 93 (39%)
|
the reef. In Tunnel _C_, which was considerably behind Tunnels _B_ and
_D_, the shutters, although placed, were never used against the face, and the excavation was carried on by poling the top and breasting the face. The change resulted in much better progress and fewer blows. The excavation through the soft material in Tunnel _C_ had just been completed when Tunnel _A_ was started, and the gangs of workmen were exchanged. The work in soft ground in Tunnel _A_ thus gained the benefit of the experience in Tunnel _C_. Shutters were placed only in the top compartments in this tunnel, and, as in Tunnel _C_, were never used in contact with the face. The method of work is shown by Figs. 1, 2, and 3, Plate LXXI. The result was still more rapid progress in Tunnel _A_, and although the loss of air was fully as great in this tunnel as in the other three, there was only one blow which caused any considerable loss of pressure. In Tunnels _A_ and _C_ the diaphragms in the rear of the center compartments of the lower tiers of working chambers were removed before the shields entered the soft ground. The change was not of as much advantage in soft ground as in rock, but it facilitated the removal of the soft wet sand in the bottom. In Tunnel _A_, after encountering gravel, a belt conveyor was suspended from the traveling stage with one end projecting through the opening into the working compartment. The use of the conveyor made it possible to continue mucking at the face while the bottom plates of the iron lining were being put in place, and resulted in a material increase in the rate of progress. [Illustration: PLATE LXXI] The shutters were not placed on the Long Island shields at all. Just before the shields passed into all soft ground, a fixed hood was |
|