The Autobiography of a Play - Papers on Play-Making, II by Bronson Howard
page 30 of 33 (90%)
page 30 of 33 (90%)
|
America, will see the necessity of thinking twice before using the
term at all. Some of the more general considerations to be kept in view, when a careful and properly educated critic feels justified in using the word "construction," may be jotted down as follows: I. The actual strength of the main incident of a play. II. Relative strength of the main incident, in reference to the importance of the subject; and also to the length of the play. III. Adequacy of the story in relation to the importance and dignity of the main incident and of the subject. IV. Adequacy of the original motives on which the rest of the play depends. V. Logical sequence of events by which the main incident is reached. VI. Logical results of the story after the main incident is passed. VII. The choice of the characters by which the sequence of events is developed. VIII. Logical, otherwise natural, use of motives in these particular characters, in leading from one incident to another. IX. The use of such human emotions and passions as are universally recognized as true, without those special explanations which belong to general fiction and not to the stage. |
|