The Growth of English Drama by Arnold Wynne
page 16 of 315 (05%)
page 16 of 315 (05%)
|
fought for the possession of the most recent mounds as highest points of
vantage? Those whose dead lay buried there raised effectual outcries against this desecration. To go back into the church seemed impossible. The next move had to be into the street. It was at this point that there set in that alienation of the Church from the Stage which was never afterwards removed. Clerical actors were forbidden to play in the streets. As an inevitable consequence, the learned language, Latin, was replaced more and more by the people's own tongue. Soon the festivals assumed a nature which the stricter clergy could not view with approval. From miles around folk gathered together for merriment and trading. There were bishops who now denounced public plays as instruments of the devil. Thus the drama, having outgrown its infancy, passed from the care of the Church into the hands of the Laity. It took with it a tradition of careful acting, a store of Biblical subjects, a fair variety of characters--including a thundering Herod and a mischievous Devil--and some measure of freedom in dialogue. It gained a native language and a boundless popularity. But for many long years after the separation the _Epiphany Plays_ continued to be acted in the churches, and by their very existence possibly kept intact the link with religion which preserved for the public Mysteries and Miracles an attitude of soberness and reverence in the hearts of their spectators. The so-called _Coventry Play_ of the fifteenth century is a testimony to the persistence of the serious religious element in the final stage of these popular Bible plays. [Footnote 1: Mr. E.K. Chambers's translation.] [Footnote 2: Mr. E.K. Chambers's translation.] |
|