Legends of Babylon and Egypt in relation to Hebrew tradition by L. W. (Leonard William) King
page 24 of 225 (10%)
page 24 of 225 (10%)
|
latter may have been in great measure a development, and
not, as is often assumed, a complete misunderstanding of the later Egyptian cult. (2) _C.I.S._, II. i, tab. XI, No. 122. (3) A very similar monument is the Carpentras Stele (_C.I.S._, II., i, tab. XIII, No. 141), commemorating Taba, daughter of Tahapi, an Aramaean lady who was also a convert to Osiris. It is rather later than that of Abbâ and his wife, since the Aramaic characters are transitional from the archaic to the square alphabet; see Driver, _Notes on the Hebrew Text of the Books of Samuel_, pp. xviii ff., and Cooke, _North Semitic Inscriptions_, p. 205 f. The Vatican Stele (op. cit. tab. XIV. No. 142), which dates from the fourth century, represents inferior work. If our examples of Semitic art were confined to the Persian and later periods, they could only be employed to throw light on their own epoch, when through communication had been organized, and there was consequently a certain pooling of commercial and artistic products throughout the empire.(1) It is true that under the Great King the various petty states and provinces were encouraged to manage their own affairs so long as they paid the required tribute, but their horizon naturally expanded with increase of commerce and the necessity for service in the king's armies. At this time Aramaic was the speech of Syria, and the population, especially in the cities, was still largely Aramaean. As early as the thirteenth century sections of this interesting Semitic race had begun to press into Northern Syria from the middle Euphrates, and they absorbed not only the old Canaanite |
|