The Modern Regime, Volume 2 by Hippolyte Taine
page 84 of 369 (22%)
page 84 of 369 (22%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
which invented and practiced dictatorship had to be employed for the
affirmation of dictatorship with that precision and that copiousness, with that excess of energy and of conviction. II. The Bishops and their new Situation. The bishop in his diocese. - Change of situation and rôle. - Depreciation of other local authorities. - Diminution of other ecclesiastical authorities. - Decline of the chapter and the jurisdiction. - The bishop alone dispenses rigors and favors. - Use of displacement. - Second-class clergy subject to military discipline. - Why it submits to this. The change brought about in the condition and role of the bishop was not less grave. Along with the court noblesse and great ecclesiastical property, we see the prelate of the old régime disappearing by degrees, the younger son of a noble family, promoted by favor and very young, endowed with a large income and much more a man of the world than of the Church. In 1789, out of 134 bishops or archbishops, only 5 were of plebeian origin; in 1889, out of 90 bishops or archbishops there are only 4 of them nobles;[21] previous to the Revolution, the titular of an Episcopal see enjoyed, on the average, a revenue of 100,000 francs; at the present day, he receives only a salary of from 10,000 to 15,000 francs.[22] In place of the grand seignior, an amiable and magnificent host, given to display and to entertaining the best company, keeping an open table in his diocese when he happens to be there, but generally absent, an habitué of Paris or a courtier at Versailles, we see another stepping forward to take his seat He is |
|