year to Paris to settle accounts with his correspondents. A sum of
twelve hundred francs, locked up in a drawer, was stolen from him, and,
accompanied by his nephew, he went to inform the police. On investigation
being made, it was found that the chest of drawers had been broken at the
top. As at the time of the theft of the seventy-nine Louis from the
abbe, Derues was the only person known to have entered his uncle's room.
The innkeeper swore to this, but the uncle took pains to justify his
nephew, and showed his confidence shortly after by becoming surety for
him to the extent of five thousand livres. Derues failed to pay when the
time expired, and the holder of the note was obliged to sue the surety
for it.

He made use of any means, even the most impudent, which enabled him to
appropriate other people's property. A provincial grocer on one occasion
sent him a thousand-weight of honey in barrels to be sold on commission.
Two or three months passed, and he asked for an account of the sale.
Derues replied that he had not yet been able to dispose of it
advantageously, and there ensued a fresh delay, followed by the same
question and the same reply. At length, when more than a year had
passed, the grocer came to Paris, examined his barrels, and found that
five hundred pounds were missing. He claimed damages from Derues, who
declared he had never received any more, and as the honey had been sent
in confidence, and there was no contract and no receipt to show, the
provincial tradesman could not obtain compensation.

As though having risen by the ruin of Madame Legrand and her four
children was not enough, Derues grudged even the morsel of bread he had
been obliged to leave her. A few days after the fire in the cellar,
which enabled him to go through a second bankruptcy, Madame Legrand, now
undeceived and not believing his lamentations, demanded the money due to