Narratives of New Netherland, 1609-1664 by Unknown
page 60 of 97 (61%)
page 60 of 97 (61%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
consented to, yet he introduced it by force. The brewers who
would not agree to it had their beer given over to the soldiers. So it was enforced, but it caused great strife and discontent. >From this time forward the Director began to divide the people and to create factions. Those who were on his side could do nothing amiss, however bad it might be; those who were opposed to him were always wrong even if they did perfectly right, and the order to reckon half an offence a whole one was then strictly enforced. The jealousy of the Director was so great that he could no bear without suspicion that impartial persons should visit his partisans. After the war was, as the Director himself said, finished-- though in our opinion it will never be finished until the country is populated--every one hoped that this impost would be removed, but Director Kieft put off the removal until the arrival of a new Director, which was longed for very much. When finally he did appear,<1> it was like the crowning of Rehoboam, for, instead of abolishing the beer-excise, his first business was to impose a wine-excise and other intolerable burdens, so that some of the commonalty, as they had no spokesman, were themselves constrained to remonstrate against it. Instead however of obtaining the relief which they expected, they received abuse from the Director. Subsequently a written answer was given them, which the Director had, as usual, drawn up at such length and with such fulness that plain and simple people, such as are here, must be confused, and unable to make anything out of it. Further attempts have accordingly been made from time to time to |
|