feels for another; and in a little while, they had the conversation
pretty much to themselves. It touched this theme and that, and
finally drifted in a direction which enabled Mr. Ridley to refer to
what he had heard Mr. Elliott say about the healthy effect of pure
wine on the taste of men whose appetites had become morbid, and to
ask him if he had any good ground for his belief.

"I do not know that I can bring any proof of my theory," returned
Mr. Elliott, "but I hold to it on the ground of an eternal fitness
of things. Wine is good, and was given by God to make glad the
hearts of men, and is to be used temperately, as are all other
gifts. It may be abused, and is abused daily. Men hurt themselves by
excess of wine as by excess of food. But the abuse of a thing is no
argument against its use. If a man through epicurism or gormandizing
has brought on disease, what do you do with him? Deny him all food,
or give him of the best in such quantities as his nutritive system
can appropriate and change into healthy muscle, nerve and bone? You
do the latter, of course, and so would I treat the case of a man who
bad hurt himself by excess of wine. I would see that he had only the
purest and in diminished quantity, so that his deranged system might
not only have time but help in regaining its normal condition."

"And you think this could be safely done?" said Mr. Ridley.

"That is my view of the case."

"Then you do not hold to the entire abstinence theory?"

"No, sir; on that subject our temperance people have run into what
we might call fanaticism, and greatly weakened their influence. Men