Story of Creation as Told By Theology and By Science by T. S. (Thomas Suter) Ackland
page 28 of 166 (16%)
page 28 of 166 (16%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
These are the three branches of science which come especially into collision with the Mosaic Record of the Creation. Of these Geology is the most important, because it is able to bring forward unquestionable facts which are in direct opposition to the traditionary interpretation Astronomy and physiology have little to object except theoretical views; the hypotheses of Laplace and Darwin. These, however, will have to be carefully considered. It will be necessary for us first to ascertain whether there really exists any such fundamental discrepancy between the record and ascertained facts, or theories so far as they are supported by facts, and stand on a probable footing, as should render all attempts at harmonizing them vain. If this is found not to be the case, we shall then be in a position to inquire whether modern discoveries afford us any really valuable light, and can assist us to form a somewhat more extended and accurate idea of the processes described by the sacred historian. CHAPTER II. DIFFICULTIES IN GEOLOGY. The principal points on which there is a supposed discrepancy between the Mosaic Record and the discoveries of geologists are as follows:-- |
|