Besides the nine Counters, it also requires one Player, AT LEAST.
I am not aware of any Game that can be played with LESS than this
number: while there are several that require MORE: take Cricket,
for instance, which requires twenty-two. How much easier it is,
when you want to play a Game, to find ONE Player than twenty-two.
At the same time, though one Player is enough, a good deal more
amusement may be got by two working at it together, and correcting
each other's mistakes.

A second advantage, possessed by this Game, is that, besides being
an endless source of amusement (the number of arguments, that may
be worked by it, being infinite), it will give the Players a little
instruction as well. But is there any great harm in THAT, so long
as you get plenty of amusement?



CONTENTS.


CHAPTER PAGE

I. NEW LAMPS FOR OLD.
1. Propositions . . . . . . . 1
2. Syllogisms . . . . . . . . 20
3. Fallacies . . . . . . . . 32

II. CROSS QUESTIONS.
1. Elementary . . . . . . . . 37
2. Half of Smaller Diagram. Propositions