Luck or Cunning? by Samuel Butler
page 97 of 291 (33%)
page 97 of 291 (33%)
|
one my business should be confined to pointing out as clearly and
succinctly as I can the issue between the two great main contending opinions concerning organic development that obtain among those who accept the theory of descent at all; nor do I believe that this can be done more effectually and accurately than by saying, as above, that Mr. Charles Darwin (whose name, by the way, was "Charles Robert," and not, as would appear from the title-pages of his books, "Charles" only), Mr. A. R. Wallace, and their supporters are the apostles of luck, while Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck, followed, more or less timidly, by the Geoffroys and by Mr. Herbert Spencer, and very timidly indeed by the Duke of Argyll, preach cunning as the most important means of organic modification. NOTE.--It appears from "Samuel Butler: A Memoir" (II, 29) that Butler wrote to his father (Dec. 1885) about a passage in Horace (near the beginning of the First Epistle of the First Book) - Nunc in Aristippi furtim praecepta relabor, Et mihi res, non me rebus subjungere conor. On the preceding page he is adapting the second of these two verses to his own purposes.--H. F. J. CHAPTER VII--(Intercalated) Mr. Spencer's "The Factors of Organic Evolution" |
|