V. PRONOUNS, . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
VI. NUMBER, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
VII. ADVERBS, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
VIII. CONJUNCTIONS, . . . . . . . . . . . 156
IX. CORRELATIVES, . . . . . . . . . . . 162
X. THE INFINITIVE, . . . . . . . . . . 166
XI. PARTICIPLES, . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
XII. PREPOSITIONS, . . . . . . . . . . . 174
XIII. THE ARTICLE, . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
XIV. REDUNDANCY, . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
XV. TWO NEGATIVES, . . . . . . . . . . . 194
XVI. ACCORDANCE OF VERB WITH SUBJECT, . . 198
_________________________________________________________________

3

INTRODUCTION
_______

Homer, in all probability, knew no rules of rhetoric, and was not
tortured with the consideration of grammatical construction, and yet
his verse will endure through time. If everybody possessed the genius
of Homer, rules and cautions in writing would be unnecessary.

To-day all men speak, and most men write, but it is observed that
those who most closely follow Homer's method of writing without rules
are most unlike Homer in the results. The ancient bard was a law unto
himself; we need rules for our guidance.

Rules of writing are the outgrowth of the study of the characteristics