The Unexpurgated Case Against Woman Suffrage by Almroth Wright
page 82 of 108 (75%)
page 82 of 108 (75%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Proceeding now on the assumption that these things are so, and that
man feels that he and woman belong to different intellectual castes, we come now to the question as to whether it is man who is selfish when he excludes women from his institutions, or woman when she unceasingly importunes for admittance. And we may define as _selfish_ all such conduct as pursues the advantage of the agent at the cost of the happiness and welfare of the general body of mankind. We shall be in a better position to pronounce judgment on this question of ethics when we have considered the following series of analogies: When a group of earnest and devout believers meet together for special intercession and worship, we do not tax them with selfishness if they exclude unbelievers. Nor do we call people who are really devoted to music selfish if, coming together for this, they make a special point of excluding the unmusical. Nor again would the imputation of selfishness lie against members of a club for black-balling a candidate who would, they feel, be uncongenial. Nor should we regard it as an act of selfishness if the members of a family circle, or of the same nation, or of any social circle, desired to come together quite by themselves. Nor yet would the term selfish apply to an East End music hall audience when they eject any one who belongs to a different social |
|


