The Flying Saucers are Real by Donald E. (Donald Edward) Keyhoe
page 53 of 252 (21%)
page 53 of 252 (21%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
time intervals did not coincide.
"It is still considered 'Unidentified.' The Venus explanation, even though now denied, puzzled me. It was plain that the Air Force had seriously considered offering it as the answer then abandoned it. Apparently someone had got his signals mixed and let Shallett use the discarded answer. And for some unknown reason, the Air Force had found it imperative to deny the Venus story at once. In these first weeks of checking, I had run onto the Venus explanation in other cases. Several Air Force officers repeated it so quickly that it had the sound of a stock alibi. But in the daytime cases this was almost ridiculous. I knew of a few instances in World War II when bomber crews and antiaircraft gunners had loosed a few bursts at Venus. But this was mostly at night, when the planet was at peak brilliance. And more than one gunner later admitted firing to relieve long hours of boredom. Since enemy planes did not carry lights, there was no authentic case, to my knowledge, where plane or ground gunners actually believed Venus was an enemy aircraft. {p. 39} Checking the astronomer's report, I read over the concluding statement: "It simply could not have been Venus. They must have been desperate |
|