Proserpine and Midas by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley
page 17 of 84 (20%)
page 17 of 84 (20%)
|
Romanticism appears to be closely connected with it.
It is an alluring subject to investigate. How the progress of scholarship, the recent 'finds' of archaeology, the extension of travelling along Mediterranean shores, the political enthusiasms evoked by the stirrings of young Italy and young Greece, all combined to reawaken in the poetical imagination of the times the dormant memories of antiquity has not yet been told by the historians of literature. [Footnote: At least as far as England is concerned. For France, cf. Canat, _La renaissance de la Grece antique_, Hachette, Paris, 1911.] But--and this is sufficient for our purpose--every one knows what the Elgin Marbles have done for Keats and Shelley; and what inspirations were derived from their pilgrimages in classic lands by all the poets of this and the following generation, from Byron to Landor. Such experiences could not but react on the common conception of mythology. A knowledge of the great classical sculpture of Greece could not but invest with a new dignity and chastity the notions which so far had been nurtured on the Venus de' Medici and the Belvedere Apollo--even Shelley lived and possibly died under their spell. And 'returning to the nature which had inspired the ancient myths', the Romantic poets must have felt with a keener sense 'their exquisite vitality'. [Footnote: J. A, Symonds, _Studies of the Greek Poets_, ii, p. 258.] The whole tenor of English Romanticism may be said to have been affected thereby. For English Romanticism--and this is one of its most distinctive merits--had no exclusiveness about it. It was too spontaneous, one would almost say, too unconscious, ever to be clannish. It grew, |
|