an independent and practically original work. Not that this
conclusion disposes by any means of all difficulties. If Quintus
did not follow the Cyclic poets, from what source did he draw his
materials? The German critic unhesitatingly answers, "from
Homer." As regards language, versification, and general spirit,
the matter is beyond controversy; but when we come to consider
the incidents of the story, we find deviations from Homer even
more serious than any of those from the Cyclic poets. And the
strange thing is, that each of these deviations is a manifest
detriment to the perfection of his poem; in each of them the
writer has missed, or has rejected, a magnificent opportunity.
With regard to the slaying of Achilles by the hand of Apollo
only, and not by those of Apollo and Paris, he might have pleaded
that Homer himself here speaks with an uncertain voice (cf.
"Iliad" xv. 416-17, xxii. 355-60, and xxi. 277-78). But, in
describing the fight for the body of Achilles ("Odyssey" xxiv. 36
sqq.), Homer makes Agamemnon say:

"So we grappled the livelong day, and we had not refrained
us then,
But Zeus sent a hurricane, stilling the storm of the battle
of men."

Now, it is just in describing such natural phenomena, and in
blending them with the turmoil of battle, that Quintus is in his
element; yet for such a scene he substitutes what is, by
comparison, a lame and impotent conclusion. Of that awful cry
that rang over the sea heralding the coming of Thetis and the
Nymphs to the death-rites of her son, and the panic with which it
filled the host, Quintus is silent. Again, Homer ("Odyssey" iv.