Formation of the Union, 1750-1829 by Albert Bushnell Hart
page 152 of 305 (49%)
page 152 of 305 (49%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
The real boldness of the Constitution is the novelty of the federal system
which it set up. For the first time in history an elaborate written constitution was applied to a federation; and the details were so skilfully arranged that the instrument framed for thirteen little agricultural communities works well for forty-four large and populous States. A second novelty was a system of federal courts skilfully brought into harmony with the State judiciary. Even here we see an effect of the twelve years experience of imperfect federation. The convention knew how to select institutions that would stand together; it also knew how to reject what would have weakened the structure. 63. THE GREAT COMPROMISES (1787). [Sidenote: State sovereignty.] It was a long time before a compromise between the discordant elements could be reached. To declare the country a centralized nation was to destroy the traditions of a century and a half: to leave it an assemblage of States, each claiming independence and sovereignty, was to throw away the results of the Revolution. The convention finally agreed that while the Union should be endowed with adequate powers, the States should retain all powers not specifically granted, and particularly the right to regulate their own internal affairs. [Sidenote: Representation of States.] The next great question all but led to the breaking up of the convention. The New Hampshire delegate had not yet appeared, and Rhode Island was |
|


