Formation of the Union, 1750-1829 by Albert Bushnell Hart
page 169 of 305 (55%)
page 169 of 305 (55%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
the Massachusetts Historical Society, by 1800 it had become a political
organization and was controlling local elections. In several States, and particularly in New York, factions had grown up about leading families of public men; in a few years they became political machines subject to the direction of a few leaders. Buying of votes was almost unknown, but there was much disorder at elections. [Sidenote: Respect for authority.] In many respects both the State and national governments were weak. The legislatures had, during the Revolution, been accustomed to ride roughshod over the minority, and they were still inclined to grant charters and privileges only to party friends; Federalist legislatures would charter only Federalist banks. Americans enjoyed their individual liberty, but resented the use of force either for collecting taxes or for upholding the authority of government; and the States were not accustomed unhesitatingly to accept the action of Congress. On the other hand, the Anglo-Saxon respect for law was recovering from the shock of the Revolution. There was a strong feeling of loyalty to the State governments, and the beginning of national interest and patriotism. By common consent the new Constitution was put quietly into effect by those who expected its success. 73. ORGANIZATION OF CONGRESS (1789). [Sidenote: First congressional election.] The first step in the organization of the government was to elect senators and representatives. The Senate was small, and was expected to be a kind |
|


