distinguished tyrants the world over, and should never be tolerated by a
free people. Open hostility to oppression was more than once hinted in a
portion of the press--as not only a right, but a duty.

Even the London _Times_ said, "It would have been strange, indeed, if
the American people had submitted to a measure which is a distinctive mark
of the most despotic governments of the Continent." As if the fact that a
measure, because resorted to by a despotic government, was therefore
necessarily wrong. It might as well be said, that because settling
national difficulties by an appeal to arms has always been a distinctive
feature of despotic governments, therefore the American people should
refuse to sustain the government by declaring or prosecuting any war; or
that because it has always been a distinctive feature of despotic
governments to have naval and military schools, to train men to the art of
war, therefore the American people should not submit to either. It is not
of the slightest consequence to us what despotic governments do or not do;
the simple question is, whether the measure is necessary for the
protection of our own government, and the welfare of the people. To leave
this untouched, and talk only about despotism, the right of the people,
and all that, is mere demagogism, and shows him who utters it to be unfit
to control public opinion. Besides, there is a great difference between
measures that are despotic, which are put forth to save the nation's life,
or honor, and those put forth to destroy freedom, and for selfish ends.
Not that, intrinsically, despotic measures are always not to be deprecated
and avoided, if possible; for if tolerated in one case, they may be
exacted in another.

[Illustration: FORT LAFAYETTE, NEW YORK HARBOR.]

[Illustration: FORT HAMILTON, from whence U.S. Troops were sent to aid in