Why We Are at War : Messages to the Congress January to April 1917 by Woodrow Wilson
page 16 of 53 (30%)
page 16 of 53 (30%)
|
and the German Government is convinced that the Government of the
United States does not think of making such a demand, knowing that the Government of the United States has repeatedly declared that it is determined to restore the principle of the freedom of the seas from whatever quarter it has been violated. HOW THE UNITED STATES REPLIED To this the Government of the United States replied on the 8th of May, accepting, of course, the assurances given, but adding: The Government of the United States feels it necessary to state that it takes it for granted that the Imperial German Government does not intend to imply that the maintenance of its newly announced policy is in any way contingent upon the course or result of diplomatic negotiations between the Government of the United States and any other belligerent Government, notwithstanding the fact that certain passages in the Imperial Government's note of the 4th instant might appear to be susceptible to that construction. In order, however, to avoid any possible misunderstanding, the Government of the United States notifies the Imperial Government that it cannot for a moment entertain, much less discuss, a suggestion that respect by German naval authorities for the rights of citizens of the United States upon the high seas should in any way or in the slightest degree be made contingent upon the conduct of any other Government affecting the rights of neutrals and non-combatants. Responsibility in such matters is single, not joint; absolute, not relative. To this note of the 8th of May the Imperial German Government made no |
|