Battle Studies by Colonel Charles-Jean-Jacques-Joseph Ardant du Picq
page 62 of 303 (20%)
page 62 of 303 (20%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
they do not desire to acknowledge weakness.
The Gaul, a fool in war, used barbarian tactics. After the first surprise, he was always beaten by the Greeks and Romans. The Greek, a warrior, but also a politician, had tactics far superior to those of the Gauls and the Asiatics. The Roman, a politician above all, with whom war was only a means, wanted perfect means. He had no illusions. He took into account human weakness and he discovered the legion. But this is merely affirming what should be demonstrated. CHAPTER II KNOWLEDGE OF MAN MADE ROMAN TACTICS. THE SUCCESSES OF HANNIBAL, THOSE OF CAESAR Greek tactics developed the phalanx; Roman tactics, the legion; the tactics of the barbarians employed the square phalanx, wedge or lozenge. The mechanism of these various formations is explained in all elementary books. Polybius enters into a mechanical discussion when he contrasts the phalanx and the legion. (Book 18.) |
|