A Brief History of Panics and Their Periodical Occurrence in the United States by Clément Juglar
page 43 of 131 (32%)
page 43 of 131 (32%)
|
very well-deserved comments. In a second debate the first resolution was
rescinded by a vote of 40 to 38. In the following session the proposition was renewed with more vigor, and forty-one banks with a capital of $17,000,000 were authorized by a large majority; the representations of the Executive proved useless, and they immediately entered upon their duties with an insufficient capital. To discount their own stock was a soon-discovered method. They thus increased the amount of notes, which depreciated in comparison with hard money, and dissipated on all hands the hope of exchanging with it. In the absence of a demand from abroad for hard money, the demand came from within our own borders. The laws of New England, which were very severe upon the banks, had placed a penalty of 12 per cent. upon the annual interest payments of those persons who did not pay their notes. The natural result was a difference of value between New England and Pennsylvania, which measured the depreciation caused by paper in the latter district. As remittances on New England could only be made in hard money, the equilibrium of the banks was disturbed; they were not able to respond to the demands for redemption, and a suspension of payments by the banks of the United States, except those of New England, took place in August and September, 1814. THE PANIC OF 1814.--An agreement took place at Philadelphia between the bank and the chief houses allied with it to resume payments at the end of the war. Unhappily, the public did not demand the accomplishment of this promise |
|