Friends in Council — First Series by Sir Arthur Helps
page 64 of 185 (34%)
page 64 of 185 (34%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
at finding that all their suffering had led to no sure basis of
persecution of the other side. Dunsford. I wonder, Ellesmere, what you would have done in persecuting times. What escape would your sarcasm have found for itself? Milverton. Some orthodox way, I daresay. I do not think he would have been particularly fond of martyrdom. Ellesmere. No. I have no taste for making torches for truth, or being one: I prefer humane darkness to such illumination. At the same time one cannot tell lies; and if one had been questioned about the incomprehensibilities which men in former days were so fierce upon, one must have shown that one disagreed with all parties. Dunsford. Do not say "one:" _I_ should not have disagreed with the great Protestant leaders in the Reformation, for instance. Ellesmere. Humph. Milverton. If we get aground upon the Reformation, we shall never push off again--else would I say something far from complimentary to those Protestant proceedings which we may rather hope were Tudoresque than Protestant. Ellesmere. No, that is not fair. The Tudors were a coarse, fierce race; but it will not do to lay the faults of their times upon them only. Look at Elizabeth's ministers. They had about as much notion of religious tolerance as they had of Professor Wheatstone's |
|