Conspiracy of Catiline and the Jurgurthine War by 86 BC-34? BC Sallust
page 106 of 325 (32%)
page 106 of 325 (32%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Catiline against his country, but for his country against Catiline".
Val. Max., v.8. The Roman laws allowed fathers absolute control over the lives of their children. [200] XL. Certain deputies of the Allobroges--_Legatos Allobrogum_. Plutarch, in his Life of Cicero, says that there were then at Rome _two deputies_ from this Gallic nation, sent to complain of oppression on the part of the Roman governors. [201] As Brutus was then absent from Borne--_Nam tum Brutus ab Roma, aberat_. From this remark, say Zanchius and Omnibonus, it is evident that Brutus was not privy to the conspiracy. "What sort of woman _Sempronia_ was, has been told in c. 25. Some have thought that she was the wife of Decimus Brutus; but since Sallust speaks of her as being in the decay of her beauty at the time of the conspiracy, and since Brutus, as may be seen in Caesar (B. G. vii., sub fin.), was then very young, it is probable that she had only an illicit connection with him, but had gained such an ascendency over his affections, by her arts of seduction, as to induce him to make her his mistress, and to allow her to reside in his house." _Beauzee_. I have, however, followed those who think that Brutus was the husband of Sempronia. Sallust (c. 24), speaking of the woman, of whom Sempronia was one, says that Catiline _credebat posse--viros earum vel adjungere sibi, vel interficere_. The truth, on such a point, is of little importance. [202] XLI. To be expected from victory--_In spe victoriae_. [203] Certain rewards--_Certa praemia_. "Offered by the senate to those who should give information of the conspiracy. See c. 30." |
|