Moral Philosophy by S. J. Joseph Rickaby
page 188 of 356 (52%)
page 188 of 356 (52%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
_Readings_.--_C. Gent_., i., 4; 1a 2a, q. 91, art. 4, in corp. CHAPTER II. OF THE DUTY OF PRESERVING LIFE. SECTION I.--_Of Killing, Direct and Indirect_. 1. In a hilly country, two or three steps sometimes measure all the interval between the basins of two rivers, whose mouths are miles apart. In the crisis of an illness the merest trifle will turn the scale between death and recovery. In a nice point of law and intricate procedure, the lawyer is aware that scarcely more than the thickness of the paper on which he writes lies between the case going for his client or for the opposite party. To rail at these fine technicalities argues a lay mind, unprofessional and undiscerning. _Hair-splitting_, so far as it is a term of real reproach, means splitting the wrong hairs. The expert in any profession knows what things to divide and distinguish finely, and what things to take in the gross. Moral Science in many respects gives its demonstrations, and can give them, only "in the way of rough drawing," as Aristotle says. ([Greek: pachulos kai tupo], _Ethics_, I., iii., 4.) But there are lines of division exceeding fine and nice in natural morality no less than in positive law. The student must not take scandal at the fine lines and subtle distinctions that we shall be obliged to draw in marking off lawful from unlawful action touching human life. |
|