Moral Philosophy by S. J. Joseph Rickaby
page 193 of 356 (54%)
page 193 of 356 (54%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
A-----------------------------------E( )V ] A, the _agent_, a bead on a wire, can move only on the line AE, that alone being the line of means to the end. EV, _reasonableness of end in view_, attracting A. UC, the amount of moral evil which the _untoward circumstance_ would involve, if it were willed directly. This UC repels A, tending to jam it on the line AE, which is absolutely rigid. AE, remoteness, difficulty, and uncertainty of the end in view. AU, remoteness of untoward circumstance from means chosen, which A is just in the act of taking. Then, for lawful action, the reasonableness required in the end in view is represented by the variation-- [Illustration: UC . AE EV *varies* ------- AU ] We observe that when AU is zero, while UC . AE remains a finite quantity (representing an appreciable evil), then EV becomes infinite: that is to say, when the distance, difference, or distinction between the evil circumstance and the means comes down to nothing at all, and the evil thing actually is the very means taken, then an infinite |
|