The Jargon File, Version 4.0.0, 24 Jul 1996 by Various
page 129 of 773 (16%)
page 129 of 773 (16%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
(This is particularly surprising because the label doesn't appear
to have anything to do with the flow of control at all!) While sufficiently astonishing to the unsuspecting reader, this form of `COME FROM' statement isn't completely general. After all, control will eventually pass to the following statement. The implementation of the general form was left to Univac FORTRAN, ca. 1975 (though a roughly similar feature existed on the IBM 7040 ten years earlier). The statement `AT 100' would perform a `COME FROM 100'. It was intended strictly as a debugging aid, with dire consequences promised to anyone so deranged as to use it in production code. More horrible things had already been perpetrated in production languages, however; doubters need only contemplate the `ALTER' verb in {COBOL}. `COME FROM' was supported under its own name for the first time 15 years later, in C-INTERCAL (see {INTERCAL}, {retrocomputing}); knowledgeable observers are still reeling from the shock. :comm mode: /kom mohd/ /n./ [ITS: from the feature supporting on-line chat; the term may spelled with one or two m's] Syn. for {talk mode}. :command key: /n./ [Mac users] Syn. {feature key}. :comment out: /vt./ To surround a section of code with comment delimiters or to prefix every line in the section with a comment marker; this prevents it from being compiled or interpreted. Often done when the code is redundant or obsolete, but is being left in |
|