Scientific American Supplement, No. 288, July 9, 1881 by Various
page 59 of 160 (36%)
page 59 of 160 (36%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
On looking over this table, we notice that rice contains by about 20 per cent, more starch than barley, and by about 10 to 12 per cent, more than maize. But on the other hand, barley and maize are richer in albuminous matter and in ash. The extractive matter, _i. e._, the part which is soluble in cold water, is also much greater in barley and maize than in rice. The extractive matter is for barley 8.7 per cent., for maize 6.3 per cent., while rice contains only 2.1 per cent., and it consists in each case of dextrin, sugar, the soluble part of the ash, and of some nitrogenous matter (soluble albumen). The amount of woody fiber or cellulose is considerable for rice with its husk, but only slight for samples without husk. The seat of the mineral matter of the grain of rice is mainly in the husk, and as this ash is very valuable as nourishment for the yeast plant, it is an open question whether it would not be preferable to use for brewing purposes rice with its husk. The comparatively largest amount of fat is contained in maize; and as such oil is not desirable for brewing purposes, different recommendations have been advanced for freeing the grain from it. In the following table some of the mineral constituents of the three kinds of grain are compared with each other. These data refer to 100 parts of ash, and are taken from analysis given by Dr. Emil Wolf. 100 parts of Potash Lime Magnesia Phosphoric Silica grain contain acid ash. |
|