Scientific American Supplement, No. 430, March 29, 1884 by Various
page 16 of 132 (12%)
page 16 of 132 (12%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
utilized, and sold at a good price, then the cost of such motive power
may be reduced in proportion to the value of those by-products. For the purpose of comparison, let us now employ the man who would otherwise clean and prepare the primary cells, at engine driving. We let him attend to a six horse power steam engine, boiler, and dynamo machine for charging 50 accumulators, each of a capacity of 370 ampere hours, or one horse power hour. The consumption of fuel will probably amount to 40 lb. per hour, which, at the rate of 18s. a ton, will give an expenditure of nearly 4d. per hour. The energy derived from coal in the accumulator costs, in the case of a supply of five electrical horse power for seven hours, 2s. 9d.; the energy derived from the zinc in a primary battery, supplying five electrical horse power for seven hours, would cost 17s. 3d. It is hardly probable that any one would lay down a complete plant, consisting of a steam or gas engine and dynamo, for the sole purpose of charging the boat cells, unless such a boat were in almost daily use, or unless several boats were to be supplied with electrical power from one station. In order that electric launches may prove useful, it will be desirable that charging stations should be established, and on many of the British and Irish rivers and lakes there is abundance of motive power, in the shape of steam or gas engines, or water-wheels. A system of hiring accumulators ready for use may, perhaps, best satisfy the conditions imposed in the case of pleasure launches. It is difficult to compile comparative tables showing the relative expenses for running steam launches, electric launches with secondary batteries, and electric launches with primary zinc batteries; but I |
|