Books Fatal to Their Authors by P. H. (Peter Hampson) Ditchfield
page 26 of 161 (16%)
page 26 of 161 (16%)
|
Paris, he wrote _Pensees Chretiennes sur les quatre Evangiles_, which was
the germ of his later work. In 1684 he fled to Brussels, because he felt himself unable to sign a formulary decreed by the Oratorians on account of its acceptance of some of the principles of Descartes to which Arnauld and the famous writers of the school of Port-Royal always offered vehement opposition. A second edition of _Reflexions Morales_ appeared in 1694 with the approval of De Noailles, then Bishop of Chalons, afterwards Archbishop of Paris. But a few years later, by the intrigues of the Jesuits, and by the order of Philip V., Quesnel was imprisoned at Mechlin. In 1703 he escaped and retired to Amsterdam, where he died in 1719. But the history of the book did not close with the author's death. It was condemned by Pope Clement XI. in 1708 as infected with Jansenism. Four years later an assembly of five cardinals and eleven theologians sat in judgment upon it; their deliberations lasted eighteen months, and the result of their labours was the famous Bull _Unigenitus_, which condemned one hundred and one propositions taken from the writings of Quesnel. The unreasonableness and injustice of this condemnation may be understood from the following extracts:-- Proposition 50.--"It is in vain that we cry to God, My _Father_, if it is not the Spirit of love that cries." This is described as "pernicious in practice, and offensive to pious ears." Proposition 54.--"It is love alone that speaks to God; it is love alone that God hears." |
|