The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved - In 50 Arguments by William A. Williams
page 120 of 183 (65%)
page 120 of 183 (65%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
been found are very few, and their _significance is hotly disputed
by scientists themselves,--both their age, and whether they are human or animal, or mere abnormalities_." Since these four creatures (of the evolutionists) can not be the ancestors of the human race, where are their descendants? Evolutionists are obliged to say they were the last of their kind. Strange! But there is no other way of escape. Prof. Bronco, of the Geological and Palaeontological Institute of Berlin University, says, "_Man appeared suddenly in the Quaternary period. Palaeontology tells us nothing on the subject,--it knows nothing of the ancestors of man_." As fossils must be imbedded in rock, there is not a single fossil of an ape-man in the world. 31. PICTURES IN CAVERNS To bolster up the hypothesis, that some of the scraps of bones belonged to ape-men; who lived about 50,000 years ago, we are told that, in many caverns there are paintings of animals, some of which are extinct, proving that the artists were ape-men of advancing intellect, living in that day. These drawings are rude, and inexact, and the resemblance to extinct animals rather fanciful. If the writer were to try to draw a picture of a horse on the stone walls of a dark cavern, with no light, it would be just as likely to resemble an |
|