Scientific American Supplement, No. 362, December 9, 1882 by Various
page 46 of 140 (32%)
page 46 of 140 (32%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
other refuse presents less difficulty, but still a considerable one,
because the animal and vegetable refuse is not kept separate from the cinders and ashes, all being thrown together into the ash pit or dust bin. The contents, therefore, cannot be deposited upon ground which may afterward be built upon, although that custom obtained generally in former times. Hence the refuse has been removed to a depot where that wretched industry is created of picking out the other parts from the cinders and ashes. [Illustration: FIG. 1.--DESTRUCTOR. Elevation. Section through feeding-holes of cells. Section through air-passages of cells.] But in towns unprovided with water closets, or so far as they are not adopted in any town, where the privies are connected with the ash pits, and where, consequently, the excreta of the population are added to the other contents of ash pits, the difficulties of removal and disposal of the refuse are much increased. Where the privy-ashpit system is in use--as it still is to a large extent--as much of the contents of the ash pits as can be sold at any price, however small, are collected separately from the drier portions, and sent out of town as manure; but what remains is still too offensive to be deposited on ground near the town; and when it is attempted to collect the excreta separately by the pail system, the process is no less unsatisfactory. These difficulties led to the adoption, under the |
|