Birth Control - A Statement of Christian Doctrine against the Neo-Malthusians by Halliday G. Sutherland
page 96 of 160 (60%)
page 96 of 160 (60%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Christianity is more professed than practised; God knows we are all lacking
enough in self-control. And yet throughout the ages moralists have preached the advantages of self-control, and we ordinary men and women know that we could do better, and that others who have gone before us have done better; but it is the self-styled "thoughtful members" who proclaim to the world that self-control in matters of sex is an impossibility, and therefore not to be even attempted. They are no common people--these epicureans, selfish even in their refinement. In addition to losing their morals, they have certainly lost their wits. Section 5. A DEGRADATION OF THE FEMALE SEX In the Neo-Malthusian propaganda there is yet another fact which--should be seized by every married woman, because it is a clear indication of a tendency to reduce women to degrading subjection. No recommendations of limited intercourse or of self-restraint according to the dictates of reason or of affection are to be found in the writings of birth controllers. Unrestrained indulgence, without the risk of consequences, is their motto. To this end they advocate certain contraceptive methods, and the reader should note that these methods require precautions to be taken solely by the woman. If she fails to take these precautions, or if the precautions themselves fail, all responsibility for the occurrence of conception rests on her alone; because her Malthusian masters have decided that she alone is to be, made responsible for preventing the natural or possible consequences of intercourse. Why? That is a very interesting question, and one to which a leading Neo-Malthusian has given the answer. In 1854 there was published, _Physical, Sexual and Natural Religion: by a Graduate of Medicine_. In the third edition the title was altered to _The |
|


