The Literary Remains of Samuel Taylor Coleridge by Unknown
page 63 of 433 (14%)
page 63 of 433 (14%)
|
Fear then in itself being mere nature cannot in itself be sin, which sin is not nature, but therefore an accessary deprivation. I suspect a misprint, and that it should be depravation'. But if not nature, then it must be a super-induced and incidental depravation of nature. The principal, namely fear, is nature; but the sin, that is, that it is a sinful fear, is but an accessary. [Footnote 1: The references are to Mr. Keble's edition (1836.)--Ed.] [Footnote 2: But see Mr. Keble's statement (Pref. xxix.), and the argument founded on discoveries and collation of MSS. since the note in the text was written.--Ed.] [Footnote 3: See Mr. Coleridge's work 'On the constitution of the Church and State according to the idea of each.'--Ed.] [Footnote 4: See E. P. I. ii. 3. p. 252.--Ed.] [Footnote 5: See the 'Church and State,' in which the 'ecclesia' or Church in Christ, is distinguished from the 'enclesia', or national Church.--Ed.] |
|