Scientific American Supplement, No. 433, April 19, 1884 by Various
page 62 of 129 (48%)
page 62 of 129 (48%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
To begin with, we often hear the question asked--why is it that certain
wires carrying very large currents give very little shock, whereas others, with very small currents, may prove fatal to those coming in contact with them? The answer to this is--that the shock a person experiences does not depend upon the current _flowing in the wires_, but upon the current _diverted from them_ and _flowing through the body_. The muscular contraction due to a galvanic current, which was first observed in the frog, gives a good illustration of the fact that it requires only a very minute current to flow through the muscles in order to contract them. Thus the simple contact of pieces of zinc and copper with the nerves generated current sufficient to excite the muscles--a current which would require a delicate galvanometer for its detection. What is true of the muscles of the frog holds good also for the human muscles; they too are very susceptible to the passage of a current. In order to determine the current which proves fatal we need only to apply the formula which expresses Ohm's law, viz., C=E/R, or the current (ampere) equals the electromotive force (volt) divided by the resistance (ohm). According to the committee of Parliament investigation, the electromotive force dangerous to life is about 300 volts; this then is the quantity, E, in the formula. There remains now only to determine the resistance in ohms which the body offers to the passage of the current. In order to obtain this, a series of measurements under different conditions were made. On account of the nature of the experiment a high resistance Thomson reflecting galvanometer was used, with the following results. |
|