The Naval War of 1812 - Or the History of the United States Navy during the Last War with Great - Britain to Which Is Appended an Account of the Battle of New Orleans by Theodore Roosevelt
page 151 of 553 (27%)
page 151 of 553 (27%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
been stated; I will give the complements shortly. The following is
the COMPARATIVE FORCE AND LOSS. Relative Weight No. Relative Loss Tons. Metal. Men. Loss. Force. Inflicted. _Constitution_ 1576 654 475 34 100 100 _Java_ 1340 576 426 150 89 23 In hardly another action the war do the accounts of the respective forces differ so widely; the official British letter makes their total of men at the beginning of the action 377, of whom Commodore Bainbridge officially reports that he paroled 378! The British state their loss in killed and mortally wounded at 24; Commodore Bainbridge reports that the dead alone amounted to nearly 60! Usually I have taken each commander's account of his own force and loss, and I should do so now if it were not that the British accounts differ among themselves, and whenever they relate to the Americans, are flatly contradicted by the affidavits of the latter's officers. The British first handicap themselves by the statement that the surgeon of the _Constitution_ was an Irishman and lately an assistant surgeon in the British navy ("Naval Chronicle," xxix, 452); which draws from Surgeon Amos A. Evans a solemn statement in the Boston _Gazette_ that he was born in Maryland and was never in the British navy in his life. Then Surgeon Jones of the _Java_, in his official report, after giving his own killed and mortally wounded at 24, says that the Americans lost in all about 60, and that 4 of their amputations perished under his own eyes; whereupon Surgeon Evans makes the statement (_Niles' Register_, vi, p. 35), backed |
|


