Library Work with Children by Alice Isabel Hazeltine
page 61 of 491 (12%)
page 61 of 491 (12%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
least practical use. It was several years before the Dewey
classification was finally adopted for the children, although we classified our grown-up books by it before we opened to the public. When the library became free, in 1892, the annual circulation of children's books rose at once to 50,000, 25 per cent of the whole, and as large as the largest total in the subscription days. We immediately had to buy a large supply of new books, carefully chosen, and printed a too fully annotated list, which we found useful for some years and discarded when we were able to open the shelves. We had only a corner for children's books, almost none for children under ten, and no admission to the shelves. We struggled on as well as we could for the next few years. A dialogue between a reader and the librarian in 1897 shows what we were trying to do at this time. It is really true, and illustrates the lack of knowledge in one of the most intelligent women in the city of the many points of contact between the library and the boys and girls of the city. Reader: "There ought to be somebody in the library to tell people, especially children, what to read." Librarian: "Have you ever seen the children's printed list, with notes on books connected with school work, and others written for older readers but interesting to children, hints on how and what to read, and a letter R against the best books?" |
|