A Study of Association in Insanity by Grace Helen Kent
page 32 of 914 (03%)
page 32 of 914 (03%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
_thief--night_ _lion--pocket-book_ _Lion--pocket-book_ is not found in the frequency tables, and is, therefore, an individual reaction; _thief--pocket-book_, however, is found there; _pocket-book_ is, therefore, classed in this case as an association to preceding stimulus. _table--fork_ _dark--mutton_ _Dark--mutton_ is not found in the frequency tables; _table--mutton_ is also not found there in the direct order, but is found in the reverse order, viz.: _mutton--table; mutton_ is, therefore, classed in this case as an association to preceding stimulus. *Association to Preceding Reaction.*--If either the reaction in question or the preceding reaction happens to be one of the stimulus words in our list, and a relationship between the two be found to exist by reference to the frequency tables--whether in direct or in reverse order--the reaction in question is classed as an association to preceding reaction. This is illustrated by the following examples: _eating--table_ _mountain--floor_ _Mountain--floor_ is an individual reaction; _table--floor_ |
|