A Study of Association in Insanity by Grace Helen Kent
page 39 of 914 (04%)
page 39 of 914 (04%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
10. Sound reactions (words).
11. Word complements. 12. Particles of speech. 13. Association to preceding stimulus. 14. Association to preceding reaction (by frequency tables). 15. Repetition of previous reaction. 16. Repetition of previous stimulus. 17. Normal (by appendix). 18. Association to preceding reaction (without frequency tables). 19. Unclassified. Sec. 6. ERRORS INVOLVED IN THE USE OF ARBITRARY OBJECTIVE STANDARDS. It may readily be seen that such definiteness and uniformity as this classification possesses results from the introduction of more or less arbitrary criteria for the differentiation of the various types of reactions. The question might arise, To what extent do the distinctions thus made correspond to reality? To consider, for instance, our rule for the placing of sound reactions (50 per cent of the sounds of the shorter word to be present, in the same order, in the other word): when a given reaction (_man--minstrel_) is in accordance with the rule assigned under the heading of sound reactions, can it be assumed that sound similarity and not some other relationship is the determining factor of the association in question? Or when in, a given instance (_cabbage--cobweb_) the sound similarity falls somewhat short of the standard required by the rule, can it be assumed that sound similarity is not, after all, the |
|