Ravenna, a Study by Edward Hutton
page 79 of 305 (25%)
page 79 of 305 (25%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Catholics, who knows what new nation might have arisen upon the ruin
of the Western empire to create, more than five hundred years before, as things were, it was to blossom, the rose of the Middle Age? [Footnote 1: Cassiodorus, op cit. iii. 9. Trs. Hodgkin, op. cit.] [Footnote 2: Cassiodorus, op. cit. v. 8.] [Footnote 3: Heathenism even more so of course. It cannot be altogether a cooincidence that those barbarians which first became Catholic, though they had been ruder and rougher than the rest, were destined to re-establish the empire in the West--the Franks.] [Illustration: S. APOLLINARE IN CLASSE] [Illustration: Colour Plate THE MAUSOLEUM OF THEODORIC] But this was not to be. The work of Theodoric, a useful work as we shall see, was serving quite another purpose than that of establishing a new Gothic kingdom. As for him and his government, they were utterly to pass away and by reason of the religion they professed. The first blow at the endurance and security of the Ostrogothic hegemony was the conversion of Clovis to Catholicism in 496. This changed the political relations, not only of every state in Gaul, but of every state in Europe, and enormously to the disadvantage of the Arians. The second was the reconciliation, in 519, of the pope and the emperor, which rightly understood was the death warrant of the Gothic kingdom. Had the Goths been Catholic, either that reconciliation would not have taken place, or it would have been without ill results for |
|