Notes and Queries, Number 31, June 1, 1850 by Various
page 43 of 65 (66%)
page 43 of 65 (66%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Michelet a much better authority than M. Collin de Plaucy, who, to judge
from his preface to another work, _Le Dictionnaire Infernal_, slavishly submits his critical acuteness to the dicta of his Church. J.B.D. * * * * * "FEAST" AND "FAST." I am not going to take part in the game of _hockey_, started by LORD BRAYBROOKE, and carried on with so much spirit by several of your correspondents in No. 28.; but I have a word to say to one of the hockey-players, C.B., who, _per fas et nefas_, has mixed up "feast and fast" with the game. C.B. asks, "Is not the derivation of 'feast' and 'fast' originally the same? that which is appointed connected with 'fas,' and that from 'fari?'" I should say no; and let me cite the familiar lines from the beginning of Ovid's _Fasti_:--{12} "Ne tamen ignores variorum jura dierum Non habet officii Lucifer omnis idem. Ille Nefastus erit per quem tria verba silentur: Fastus, erit per quem lege licebit agi. Neu toto perstare die sua jura putâris; Qui jam Fastus erit, manè Nefastus erat. Nam simul exta Deo data sunt, licet omnia fari; Verbaque Honoratus libera Praetor habet." |
|