The Development of the Feeling for Nature in the Middle Ages and Modern Times by Alfred Biese
page 14 of 509 (02%)
page 14 of 509 (02%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
the day is departed.'
'The tree of my hope which had risen so luxuriantly is broken down.' 'Removed from the bosom of my father, like a young sandal tree rent from the hill of Malaja, how shall I exist in a strange soil?' This familiar intercourse with Nature stood far as the poles asunder from the monotheistic attitude of the Hebrew. The individual, it is true, was nothing in comparison with Brahma, the All-One; but the divine pervaded and sanctified all things, and so gave them a certain value; whilst before Jehovah, throned above the world, the whole universe was but dust and ashes. The Hindoo, wrapt in the contemplation of Nature, described her at great length and for her own sake, the Hebrew only for the sake of his Creator. She had no independent significance for him; he looked at her only 'sub specie eterni Dei,' in the mirror of the eternal God. Hence he took interest in her phases only as revelations of his God, noting one after another only to group them synthetically under the idea of Godhead. Hence too, despite his profound inwardness--'The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked, who can know it?' (_Jeremiah_)--human individuality was only expressed in its relation to Jehovah. 'The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handiwork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.'--_Psalm_ 19. 'Let the heavens rejoice and let the earth be glad; let the sea roar, and the fulness thereof. |
|